As I sat there watching Kobe Bryant win his first championship without Shaq, I felt a sudden sadness. A sadness, that the game of basketball doesn’t usually cause.
It wasn’t the same sadness you get when your favorite team loses, but it was the type of sadness you get when you realize that justice isn’t going to be served.
As I watched Mark Jackson and Jeff Van Gundy at the end of the game infer that arguing about who is better between Kobe Bryant and Michael Jordan is a legitimate argument, that sadness grew even more.
It was obvious due to the talent the Lakers had that sooner or later Kobe would get his ring without Shaq, and I knew the aftermath that would occur. Since the NBA Finals, the Kobe-Jordan comparisons have not stopped, and let me tell everyone, it’s only going to get worse.
When I finally realized the game was out of reach, I went to my room sat down in utter silence and realized that the history of basketball had been changed.
Well The Kobe Bryant we see today is a much better player than Kobe Bryant who was on the Lakers during Shaq’s heydays.
Now that Kobe has won this title, people will forget this, and he may very well be in the mind of these so called “experts” such as Mark Jackson and Jeff Van Gundy elevated himself to one of the top five players of all time, if not higher.
He now has four titles, and because of his title without Shaq, Shaq’s legacy will only diminish and Bryant’s will grow as people start to forget who really led the Lakers to those first three titles.
Before I get into the details of why Kobe Bryant’s legacy should not be defined by this title, let me answer this one question first.
As I was reading an article about Kobe and Shaq, a question arose in the commentary.
“Why is it that no one questions the validity of the rings won by other stars that played with stars” (Besides Kobe)
The answer I read by, Michael T. Penn, could not have been any better. NBA betting lines.
“I think it is because most great second options aren’t hailed as the greatest thing since sliced bread like Kobe is. A lot of people love Kobe so much they want to talk about his three championships without even mentioning Shaq. That in turn leads others without the rose colored specs on to say ‘what? those were Shaq’s teams!’ That’s really all you’re looking at here.
It’s kind of like if someone were to turn around and say ‘Scottie Pippen is the best player ever because he won 6 rings’. Of course the rebuttal would be ‘Sorry but Scottie was second banana to Jordan, those were Jordan’s teams’. Then someone such as yourself may write an article about how even though Jordan was the man, Scottie was still a star. Like that clears up the issue.
Kobe was of course a great second option on those teams! The problem arises when people try to use those three rings as part of an argument to say Kobe is a better individual player than Lebron James or that he’s the greatest player not named Mike or other such over the top declarations of his unstoppableness”
On the next few pages, I’m going tell you exactly how a man with four NBA rings, who at times can be unstoppable, can really be considered overrated?To me Kobe Bryant has been overrated since he first entered the league.
When he first entered in 1997 towards the end of Michael Jordan’s career, the media and fans were looking for that next Michael Jordan. Kobe showed the flash and potential it could take to be the next one. He was immediately deemed the next Michael Jordan, a title that still sadly hasn’t faded away.
However, for you to truly understand why Kobe is overrated career wise, you have to realize what a person being overrated really means. Being overrated career wise, in a sense, means that a person’s career is perceived as being better than it really is. Down below I have listed the many reasons why Kobe Bryant has come to be overrated.
Before you read what I have to say, I just want to ask you one favor. Please read the rest of the article with an open mind, especially Lakers’ fans, or you will fail to see the truth.
Kobe Bryant Wasn’t As Big of a Factor As Perception Makes it Seem
Kobe Bryant, in reality, wasn’t as big as a factor with the Lakers during their championship runs as perception makes it seem.
If you took Shaq off the Lakers during their title runs, the Lakers wouldn’t be guaranteed to make the playoffs. When O’Neal was injured during his three peat, the Lakers had a regular-season record of 12-11 (.5217%).
When Kobe was injured, the Lakers regular season record was 25-7 (.78%). Interestingly, the Lakers’ entire regular-season record during their three-peats was 181-65 (.735%), which is a lower record than when Kobe wasn’t playing. The Lakers therefore actually had a better record when Kobe wasn’t playing.
But how could this be possible? Well as a big Lakers’ fan during their championship runs, I watched the games very closely. One thing I will tell you is that the team was at its best when the team played through Shaq.
The Lakers were most dangerous when the Lakers would play through Shaq, wait for him to get double teamed, and have players such as Rick Fox, Robert Horry, Kobe Bryant and Derek Fisher spot up for the open shot, or cut in the lane.
However, the Lakers often failed to play through Shaq enough, and it would cost them games sometimes. However, never was this more obvious than at times when Kobe would try to steal the show.
A young immature Kobe Bryant would constantly take difficult contested shots, instead of just playing through Shaq, then cutting into lane or spotting up for that open shot.
I‘ll admit that when Kobe Bryant was playing through Shaq, he was a great asset to have. Unfortunately for all the times he was an asset, he was also a cancer when he tried to be the “man”.
The Lakers’ record without Kobe and without Shaq is not a stat many people know of, as I couldn’t find it anywhere. I personally had to look at every game by game during the Lakers’ championship runs to find those stats out.
As I said earlier, I watched the Lakers very closely. One thing I noticed was that when Shaq was on the bench, the team frankly was just a mediocre team.
I also noticed that when Kobe was on the bench, the team was just as good without him. I therefore decided to do the research and find out if this was true or not.
Not coincidentally, the records I found proved my theory to be correct. As I showed earlier, the Lakers became a sub .500 team without Shaq, but had a better record without Kobe.
Bryant to me is one of the luckiest players of all time. Not many all time greats can say that they started their career playing with the best player in the NBA.
Every time Kobe looks at his first three rings, he should thank god everyday that he had the opportunity to play with Shaq. In reality the young Kobe Bryant who won three championships isn’t as good as the Kobe leading the Lakers right now.
The record books, unfortunately, will not have an asterisk that says “led by Shaq.” When Kobe is compared to the all time greats such as Michael Jordan, his first three championships to the naked eye will looks just as good as Michael Jordan’s first 3 championships.
If Kobe never played with Shaq, he likely would have one ring. Thus without most of his rings, Kobe wouldn’t be perceived to be the top five player of all time many perceive him to currently be.
Kobe Bryant is One of The Most Under-Performing Finals Player Ever
Kobe Bryant has shot 40.5 % or under in four out his six NBA Finals appearances (Around 36% in his first and 38% in his fourth appearance). How many all time greats have shot 40.5% or under once, let alone four times in the NBA Finals? Also keep in mind that in three of those four in which he shot that poorly, Shaq, not him, was the one being double teamed.
Kobe is perceived as one of the best clutch players of all time, yet on the biggest stage there is, Kobe consistently performs his worst.
In year 2000, during the regular season, Bryant averaged almost 29 points and five assists per game. How did these stats translate over to the NBA Finals? They lowered to 15 points and four assists per game.
Shaquille O’Neal, on the other hand, raised his scoring average, from 28 in the regular season to 38 in the finals.
In 2001, the Lakers once again won the NBA Finals. Kobe’s scoring average dropped in the clutch once again, forcing O’Neal to step up his scoring from 27 per game in the regular season to 33 in the finals.
In 2002, For the third straight year, Kobe’s scoring and assists declined in the series and O’Neal of course stepped it up in the finals.
Most greats like Shaq, Jordan and Duncan, all raised their level in the finals, but yet Kobe lowered his tremendously. Charles Barkley once said that stars are made in the regular season, but superstars are made in the playoffs.
Well, I would like to add on to that statement and say that stars are made in the regular season, superstars are made in the playoffs, but Legends are made in the NBA finals.
In his first three years, Kobe had the privilege of watching Shaq put up three of most dominant finals performances ever. In fact at the time of Shaq’s third championship, he was averaging the most points per game in NBA finals history. However, in Kobe’s last two NBA Finals, he cost his team the championship with his poor performances.
In the 2004 NBA Finals, Shaq averaged 26.6 points per game with a .631 field goal percentage, while Kobe Bryant averaged 22.6 points per game with a .381 field goal percentage.
However, the main reason Kobe cost the Lakers the title was that he out shot Shaq by nearly six shots despite Kobe shooting 38.1 %, while Shaq was shooting 63.1 %.
In that series, Kobe’s failure to play though Shaq hurt not only the team’s stats, but his own stats as well. Playing through Shaq more, would have helped his FGP and opened up more easy scoring opportunities.
Not to mention, logically, why should a player shooting with a much lower FGP average six more shots than a former three times finals MVP that was shooting a much higher percentage?
During the 2004 NBA Finals, Kobe decided that he was going to be the man, even if it cost the team. Not surprisingly, according to Phil Jackson‘s book “The Last Season: A Team in Search of Its Soul,” in Bryant’s exit interview with him Bryant said, “I’m tired of being a sidekick.” Shaq already had three Finals MVP’s and Kobe for once wanted that finals MVP.
Watch the tape of that series and you will see a mad man determined to be the “man,” despite the consequences the team would ultimately render.
In last year’s NBA finals against the Celtics with this time Kobe being the “man,” he again let his team down. Against the Celtics, he shot .405 from the field and averaged 3.83 turnovers a game. In fact, in three out of their four losses he shot under 35 % from the field.
Kobe all series seemed to start off playing well in the first quarter, and then fall off and never recover. Kobe is perceived to be the best closer in the game, but yet it seemed as though he often disappeared in the 4th quarters of last years finals.
In game four last year, Mark Jackson, a man who once said that Kobe Bryant will be better than Michael Jordan, even called out Kobe Bryant for not trying to take over the game in the 4th quarter.
I heard all of Kobe’s fans excuses last year. “His teammates didn’t show up,” “Kobe can’t be expected to do everything.” However, no matter what anyone wanted to say about Gasol, Odom, or any of the other Laker’s players, Kobe was the one who let his team down. If Kobe wants to take all the credit when his teams wins, he should also take all the credit when his team loses.
Now this year was easily Kobe’s best finals performance. Kobe led the team to the title and I can’t take any credit away from him. But even so, Kobe still underperformed in the NBA finals, as he shot 43 % from the field. If you at actually look at it, Kobe has had two good finals appearances out of six.
Although his numbers went down in the 2001 finals, he still played well as he shot .514 from the field. Then of course this year, despite Kobe’s FGP going down, Kobe led his team to a championship. Now two good finals out of six isn’t acceptable for a true all time great.
The true all time greats, like Jordan and Shaq, generally always showed up in the NBA finals, while Kobe has repeatedly failed to.
Kobe Is Still Compared To Michael Jordan
There are still people out there who claim that Kobe is as good as and or better than Jordan. I would dismiss these claims and not even mention it, except for the fact that there a large percentage of people who actually believe this.
Every time a Jordan Kobe debate starts there is always that one guy who claims that Kobe is better than Jordan. No matter what stats you pull out, that guy thinks he’s right and you’re wrong.
Now that Kobe has lead a team to a championship, this will only be more argued.
The Jordan – Kobe debate to me is one of the most lopsided sports debates that is frequently debated. If you look at it logically the question shouldn’t even be asked and on Page 3 I will show you why.
| Michael Jordan |
Kobe Bryant |
| 16 seasons |
13 seasons |
| 6 Championships |
4 Championships |
| 6 Finals MVPs |
1 Finals MVP |
| 10 Scoring Titles |
2 Scoring Titles |
| 1 Defensive Player Of The Year |
0 Defensive Player Of The Year |
| 5 MVPs |
1 MVP |
Jordan has better career averages than Kobe in virtually every single category besides three point percentage
( Bryant: .341, Jordan: .327) and and FT % ( Bryant: .840, Jordan: .835). Kobe also has inferior playoff averages in virtually all statistics, and inferior career finals averages in virtually all statistics to Jordan. For those of who want to claim that Kobe’s stats are skewed because of his younger days from 18-21, (even though Jordan’s are too because of his Wizards days) look at this stat.
If you take an age by age comparison of Jordan and Kobe starting with the age of 22 to the age Kobe is now, Jordan has better stats in virtually every age by age category besides some years of free throw %, a couple years of BPG, some years of 3 point percentages, and the one year Kobe averaged 35.4 points per game.
Jordan also, besides free throw percentage (.868 to .857), has the higher single season high in every category. Plus Jordan never played with a player even close to an elite center, while Kobe has had Shaq and Gasol.
Kobe Bryant’s FGP Isn’t Up There With The All-Time Greats
One reason that goes under the radar for why Kobe Bryant is overrated is that his FGP is simply not up there with the greatest guards and small forwards of all time.
Kobe has a career average of a .455 FGP, while, obviously depending on your list, no other player generally considered one of top 20 players of all time has shot that poorly.
Julius Erving shot .506 , Magic Johnson shot .520, Oscar Robertson shot 485, Larry Bird shot .496, and Michael Jordan shot .497 for their career. Kobe has also shot worse than the two players playing today that will eventually make this list, if not for a drastic injury, Wade and LeBron.
LeBron has a career average of .471, which should go up as he gets older and Wade has a career average of .483. The main reason Kobe Bryant’s FGP is worse than Wade’s, Lebron’s, and Jordan’s, is that as good of player as Kobe is, he simply isn’t as good of an inside player as those players.
Kobe relies on his jumpshot more than these players and because of this his FGP is worse. This is especially noticeable when he plays against physical defenses, such as the Rockets this year or the Celtics last year.
Before game seven of the Rockets-Lakers series, ESPN showed that against the Rockets, only 21 percent of his shots were within five feet of the hoop. Now 21 percent just isn’t good enough, and that is one reason the undermanned Rockets took the Lakers to seven games.
As it often said, “you live by the jumpshot, you die by the jumpshot.” When Kobe isn’t driving the ball enough, this statement is never more true. Now Kobe is still a great inside player, but just read what his own coach Phil Jackson has said when comparing Kobe to Jordan in an interview in 2008.
“There are somethings that Michael Jordan had, that Kobe Bryant doesn’t have. He has a bigger body, He’s stronger. Kobe’s strong. He ( Jordan) had these incredible hands. Those hands were million dollar hands, where he could do so many things with it. Besides being fouled and still making baskets-Taking the ball to the basket and getting hit and not losing control of the basketball-Being able to pick the ball of the dribble.Those are just things that physically are irreplaceable….When you look at Michael, he shot 49, 50 %, and Kobe just hasn’t been able to do that. There’s a big difference when you compare those two. The shooting percentages were quite a bit different.”
Kobe’s Team Wins When He Doesn’t Shoot Too much.
If you were watching the pregame show before game seven of the Rockets-Lakers game, you would recall that Jon Barry showed a statistic that when Kobe Bryant shoots less than 21 shots, the Lakers were 39-3.
Up to that point he had taken 150 shots total in the previous 6 games against the Rockets. Now, can you remember there being a stat like that for a player considered as great as Kobe?
Is there a stat like that for Jordan? LeBron? Wade? Well, of course the answer is no. Not to the surprise of me and Jon Barry, the Lakers beat the Rockets in game seven with Kobe only scoring 15 points.
Kobe Doesn’t Have Any “Amazing Moments”
Kobe is consider one of the clutchest players in history but yet I can’t recall him having any meaningful amazing game winners. Now Kobe has had some winning go ahead baskets in the playoffs, but he has never had one of those “Jordanesque” moment that you can replay in your head over and over again.
If you have been watching a lot of NBA games this year, you would have noticed those amazing NBA moments commercials. Well the one Kobe Bryant moment that they keep showing over again is his game winning shot against the Suns a few years ago in the first round. Here’s my problem with it. The Lakers lost the series!
Is that really the best Kobe moment that they could find. Well, sadly it could be. On the other hand, I can point out to a few plays that LeBron James has made in the playoffs in his career, that would have been better amazing moments, and sadly he is much younger than Kobe.
In reality, during the Lakers’ championship run, it was Derek Fisher, Robert Horry, Brian Shaw, and the roles players who had those amazing moments.
Once again in game four in the finals this year, it was Fisher, not Kobe who had that amazing moment.
In that game, I saw an interesting stat that tells it all. The thee players with the most three pointers in NBA Finals history are Michael Jordan, Kobe’s current teammate Derek Fisher, and his ex-teammate Robert Horry.
Kobe Simply Doesn’t Have The leadership Skills Required To Be One of The Greatest Ever.
There are just something’s you can’t teach. Leadership skills are one of those.
As talented as Kobe is, he simply isn’t as good of a leaders as most of the all time greats. As I was watching ESPN a few weeks back, I heard a quote similar to this that simply said it all. LeBron’s teammates want to play for him, while Kobe’s teammates don’t seem to want to.
While Lebron gets the most out of his less talented Cavaliers teammates, Kobe doesn’t seem get the most out of his much more talented teammates. Granted the Lakers won the title, there were many times when they underperformed. I generally help prove that Kobe isn’t a very good leader by showing an excerpt from Curt Schilling’s post on his official blog, 38pitches.com, after Game Two of the NBA Finals last year.
I, myself, can say what I want about Kobe being a leader from watching him on TV, but in reality I don’t have the first hand experience for you to believe what I have to say. The reason I find Schilling’s post so informing is that it’s not often you get to read such a controversial post from an objective well respected athlete about a first hand experience he had. Here is the excerpt from Schilling’s blog.
“From the first tip until about 4 minutes left in the game I saw and heard this guy bitch at his teammates. Every TO he came to the bench pissed, and a few of them he went to other guys and yelled about something they weren’t doing, or something they did wrong. No dialog about “hey let’s go, let’s get after it” or whatever. He spent the better part of 3.5 quarters pissed off and ranting at the non-execution or lack of, of his team. Then when they made what almost was a historic run in the 4th, during a TO, he got down on the floor and basically said ‘Let’s f’ing go, right now, right here” or something to that affect. . . . But as a fan I was watching the whole thing, Kobe, his teammates and then the after effects of conversations. He’d yell at someone, make a point, or send a message, turn and walk away, and more than once the person on the other end would roll eyes or give a ‘whatever dude’ look.
Now it’s very important to realize again what overrated means. Like I said before, Overrated means that people perceive you to be better than you are. If you talk to the average NBA fan and even some of the so called “experts” as well, many of them will believe things that simply are illogical.
There are those people who believe Kobe is as good or better than Jordan. There is an also even higher percentage of people who believe that Kobe led the Lakers to the title and not Shaq, or that they both had equal roles.
There are also people who believe that career wise, Kobe, a man with one finals MVP, is better career wise than three times finals MVP’s Shaq and Tim Duncan, and other all time greats. Kobe hasn’t done enough yet to prove that he belongs in that same company yet.
Right now as it stands Kobe has led one incredibly talented team to a championship.
Therefore, before we put him up there with Chamberlain, Shaq, Jordan, and the rest of those guys, let’s see what he does in the next few years.
With the NBA finals approaching, a stage that Kobe has repeatedly failed to rise to the occasion in, the question remains whether Kobe can win a championship on his own. For some reason, however, most people do not know of Kobe’s failure to play well in the NBA Finals and that is just one of the reasons Kobe Bryant, to me, is one of the most overrated players in NBA history.
Down below, I’m going tell you exactly how a man with three NBA rings, who has scored 81 points in a game and at times can be unstoppable, can really be considered overrated?
To me Kobe Bryant has been overrated since he first entered the league.
When he first entered in 1997 towards the end of Michael Jordan’s career, the media and fans were looking for that next Michael Jordan. Kobe showed the flash and potential it could take to be the next one. He was immediately deemed the next Michael Jordan, a title that still sadly hasn’t faded away.
However, for you to truly understand why Kobe is overrated, you have to realize what a person being overrated really means. Being overrated, in a sense, means that a person is perceived as being better than they really are. Down below I have listed the many reasons why Kobe Bryant has come to be overrated.
Before you read what I have to say, I just want to ask you one favor. Please read the rest of the article with an open mind, especially Lakers’ fans, or you will fail to see the truth.
Kobe Bryant Wasn’t As Big of a Factor As Perception Makes it Seem
Kobe Bryant, in reality, wasn’t as big as a factor with the Lakers during their championship runs as perception makes it seem.
If you took Shaq off the Lakers during their title runs, the Lakers wouldn’t be guaranteed to make the playoffs. When Shaquille was injured during his three peat, the Lakers had a regular-season record of 12-11 (.5217%).
When Kobe was injured, the Lakers regular season record was 25-7 (.78%). Interestingly, the Lakers’ entire regular-season record during their three-peats was 181-65 (.735%), which is a lower record than when Kobe wasn’t playing. The Lakers therefore actually had a better record when Kobe wasn’t playing.
But how could this could be possible? Well as a big Lakers’ fan during their championship runs, I watched the games very closely. One thing I will tell you is that the team was at its best when the team played through Shaq.
The Lakers were most dangerous when the Lakers would play through Shaq, wait for him to get double teamed, and have players such as Rick Fox, Robert Horry, Kobe Bryant, and Derek Fisher spot up for the open shot, or cut in the lane.
However, the Lakers often failed to play through Shaq enough, and it would cost them games sometimes. However, never was this more obvious than at times when Kobe would try to steal the show.
A young immature Kobe Bryant would constantly take difficult contested shots, instead of just playing through Shaq, then cutting into lane or spotting up for that open shot.
I‘ll admit that when Kobe Bryant was playing through Shaq, he was a great asset to have. Unfortunately for all the times he was an asset, he was also a cancer when he tried to be the “man”.
The Lakers’ record without Kobe and without Shaq is not a stat many people know of, as I couldn’t find it anywhere. I personally had to look at every game by game during the Lakers’ championship runs to find those stats out.
As I said earlier, I watched the Lakers very closely. One thing I noticed was that when Shaq was on the bench, the team frankly was just a mediocre team.
I also noticed that when Kobe was on the bench, the team was just as good without him. I therefore decided to do the research and find out if this was true or not.
Not coincidentally, the records I found proved my theory to be correct. As I showed earlier, the Lakers became a sub .500 team without Shaq, but had a better record without Kobe.
Bryant to me is one of the luckiest players of all time. Not many all time greats can say that they started their career playing with the best player in the NBA.
Every time Kobe looks at his rings, he should thank god everyday that he had the opportunity to play with Shaq. In reality the young Kobe Bryant who won three championships isn’t as good as the Kobe leading the Lakers right now.
However unfortunately the record books, will not have an asterisk that says “led by Shaq”. When Kobe is compared to the all time greats such as Michael Jordan, his three championships to the naked eye will looks just as good as Michael Jordan’s 3 championships.
If Kobe never played with Shaq, he likely would have no rings. Thus without the rings, Kobe wouldn’t be perceived to be the top five player of all time many perceive him to currently be.
Kobe Bryant is One of The Most Under-performing Finals Player Ever
Kobe Bryant has shot 40.5 % or under in four out his five NBA Finals appearances. (Around 36% in his first and 38% in his fourth appearance) How many all time greats have shot 40.5% or under once, let alone four times in the NBA Finals?
Kobe is perceived as one of the best clutch players of all time, yet on the biggest stage there is, Kobe consistently performs his worst.
In year 2000, during the regular season, Bryant averaged almost 29 points and five assists per game. How did these stats translate over to the NBA Finals? They lowered to 15 points and four assists per game.
Author Poll Results
Is Kobe Bryant Overrated
Shaquille O’Neal, on the other hand, raised his scoring average, from 28 in the regular season to 38 in the finals.
In 2001, the Lakers once again won the NBA Finals. Kobe’s scoring average dropped in the clutch once again, forcing O’Neal to step up his scoring from 27 per game in the regular season to 33 in the finals.
In 2002, For the third straight year, Kobe’s scoring and assists declined in the series and O’Neal of course stepped it up in the finals.
Most greats like Shaq, Jordan, and Duncan, all raised their level in the finals, but yet Kobe lowered his tremendously. Charles Barkley once said that stars are made in the regular season, but superstars are made in the playoffs.
Well, I would like to add on to that statement and say that stars are made in the regular season, superstars are made in the playoffs, but Legends are made in the NBA finals.
Kobe luckily in his first three years had the privilege of watching Shaq put up three of most dominant finals performances ever. In fact at the time of Shaq’s third championship, he was averaging the most points per game in NBA finals history. However, in Kobe’s last two NBA Finals, he cost his team the championship with his poor performances.
In the 2004 NBA Finals, Shaq averaged 26.6 points per game with a .631 field goal percentage, while Kobe Bryant averaged 22.6 points per game with a .381 field goal percentage.
However, the main reason Kobe cost the Lakers the title was that he out shot Shaq by nearly 6 shot despite Kobe shooting 38.1 %, while Shaq was shooting 63.1 %.
In that series, Kobe’s failure to play though Shaq hurt not only the team’s stats, but his own stats as well. Playing through Shaq more, would have helped his FGP and opened up more easy scoring opportunities.
Not to mention, logically, why should a player shooting with a much lower FGP average six more shots than a former three times finals MVP that was shooting a much higher percentage?
During the 2004 NBA Finals, Kobe decided that he was going to be the man, even if it cost the team. Not surprisingly According to Phil Jackson‘s book “The Last Season: A Team in Search of Its Soul“, in Bryant’s exit interview with him Bryant said, “I’m tired of being a sidekick.” Shaq already had three Finals MVP’s and Kobe for once wanted that finals MVP.
Watch the tape of that series and you will see a mad man determined to be the “man”, despite the consequences the team would ultimately render.
In last year’s NBA finals against the Celtics with this time Kobe being the “man”, he again let his team down. Against the Celtics, he shot .405 from the field and averaged 3.83 turnovers a game. In fact, in three out of their four losses he shot under 35 % from the field.
Kobe all series seemed to start off playing well in the first quarter, and then fall off and never recover. Kobe is perceived to be the best closer in the game, but yet it seemed as though he often disappeared in the 4th quarters of last years finals.
In game 4, Mark Jackson, a man who once said that Kobe Bryant will be better than Michael Jordan, even called out Kobe Bryant for not trying to take over the game in the 4th quarter.
I have heard all of Kobe’s fans excuses. “His teammates didn’t show up“, “Kobe can’t be expected to do everything.” However, no matter what anyone want to say about Gasol, Odom, or any of the other Laker’s players, Kobe was the one who let his team down. If Kobe wants to take all the credit when his teams wins, he should also take all the credit when his team loses.
The true all time greats, like Jordan and Shaq, always showed up in the NBA finals. Kobe last year proved again that he is not a true all time great when he failed once again to will his team to victory.
Kobe Is Still Compared To Michael Jordan
There are still people out there who claim that Kobe is as good as and or better than Jordan. I would dismiss these claims and not even mention it, except for the fact that there a large percentage of people who actually believe this.
Every time a Jordan Kobe debate starts there is always that one guy who claims that Kobe is better than Jordan. No matter what stats you pull out, that guy thinks he’s right and you’re wrong.
The Jordan – Kobe debate to me is one of the most lopsided sports debates that is frequently debated. If you look at it logically the question shouldn’t even be asked and down below I will show you why.
Jordan Kobe
16 seasons 13 seasons
6 championships 3 championships
6 finals MVPs 0 finals MVPs
10 scoring titles 2 scoring titles
1 Defensive POTY 0 Defensive POTY
5 MVPs 1 MVP
Jordan has better career averages than Kobe in virtually every single category besides three point percentage ( Bryant: .341, Jordan: .327) and and FT % ( Bryant: .840, Jordan: .835) Kobe also had inferior playoff averages in virtually all statistics, and inferior career finals averages in virtually all statistics to Jordan. For those of who want to claim that Kobe’s stats are skewed because of his younger days from 18-21, (even though Jordan’s are too because of his Wizards days) Look at this stat.
If you take an age by age comparison of Jordan and Kobe starting with the age of 22 to the age Kobe is now, Jordan has better stats in virtually every age by age category besides some years of free throw %, a couple years of BPG, some years of 3 point percentages, and the one year Kobe averaged 35.4 points per game. Jordan also, besides free throw percentage (.868 to .857), has the higher single season high in every category.
Kobe Bryant’s FGP Isn’t Up There With The All-Time Greats
One reason that goes under the radar for why Kobe Bryant is overrated is that his FGP is simply not up there with the greatest guards and small forwards of all time. Kobe has a career average of a .455 FGP, while, obviously depending on your list, no other player generally considered one of top 20 players of all time has shot that poorly.
Julius Erving shot .506 , Magic Johnson shot .520, Oscar Robertson shot 485, Larry Bird shot .496, and Michael Jordan shot .497 for their career. Kobe has also shot worse than the two players playing today that will eventually make this list, if not for a drastic injury, Wade and LeBron.
LeBron has a career average of .471, which should go up as he gets older and Wade has a career average of .483. The main reason Kobe Bryant’s FGP is worse than Wade’s, Lebron’s, and Jordan’s, is that as good of player as Kobe is, he simply isn’t as good of an inside player as those players.
Kobe relies on his jumpshot more than these players and because of this his FGP is worse. This is especially noticeable when he plays against physical defenses, such as the Rockets this year or the Celtics last year.
Before game seven of the Rockets-Lakers series, ESPN showed that against the Rockets, only 21 percent of his shots were within five feet of the hoop. Now 21 percent just isn’t good enough, and that is one reason the undermanned Rockets took the Lakers to seven games.
As it often said, “you live by the jumpshot, you die by the jumpshot.” When Kobe isn’t driving the ball enough, this statement is never more true. Now Kobe is still a great inside player, but just read what his own coach Phil Jackson has said when comparing Kobe to Jordan in an interview in 2008.
“There are somethings that Michael Jordan had, that Kobe Bryant doesn’t have. He has a bigger body, He’s stronger. Kobe’s strong. He ( Jordan) had these incredible hands. Those hands were million dollar hands, where he could do so many things with it. Besides being fouled and still making baskets-Taking the ball to the basket and getting hit and not losing control of the basketball-Being able to pick the ball of the dribble.Those are just things that physically are irreplaceable….When you look at Michael, he shot 49, 50 %, and Kobe just hasn’t been able to do that. There’s a big difference when you compare those two. The shooting percentages were quite a bit different.”
Kobe’s Team Wins When He Doesn’t Shoot Too much.
If you were watching the pregame show before game seven of the Rockets-Lakers game, you would recall that Jon Barry showed a statistic that when Kobe Bryant shoots less than 21 shots, the Lakers were 39-3.
Up to that point he had taken 150 shots total in the previous 6 games against the Rockets. Now, can you remember there being a stat like that for a player considered as great as Kobe?
Is there a stat like that for Jordan? LeBron? Wade? Well, of course the answer is no. Not to the surprise of me and Jon Barry, the Lakers beat the Rockets in game seven with Kobe only scoring 15 points.
Kobe Doesn’t Have Any “Amazing Moments”
Kobe is consider one of the clutchest players in history but yet I can’t recall him having any meaningful amazing game winners. Now Kobe has had some winning go ahead baskets in the playoffs, but he has never had one of those “Jordanesque” moment that you can replay in your head over and over again.
If you have been watching a lot of NBA games, you would have noticed those amazing NBA moments commercials. Well the one Kobe Bryant moment that they keep showing over again is his game winning shot against the Suns a few years ago in the first round. Here’s my problem with it. The Lakers lost the series!
Is that really the best Kobe moment that they could find. Well, sadly it could be. On the other hand, I can point out to a few plays that LeBron James has made in the playoffs in his career, that would have been better amazing moments, and sadly he is much younger than Kobe.
In reality, during the Lakers’ championship run, it was Derek Fisher, Robert Horry, Brian Shaw, and the roles players who had those amazing moments.
Kobe Simply Doesn’t Have The leadership Skills Required To Be One of The Greatest Ever.
There are just something’s you can’t teach. Leadership skills are one of those.
As talented as Kobe is, he simply isn’t as good of a leaders as most of the all time greats. As I was watching ESPN a few weeks back, I heard a quote similar to this that simply said it all. LeBron’s teammates want to play for him, while Kobe’s teammates don’t seem to want to.
While Lebron gets the most out of his less talented Cavaliers teammates, Kobe doesn’t seem get the most out of his much more talented teammates. I generally help prove that Kobe isn’t a very good leader by showing an excerpt from Curt Schilling’s post on his official blog, 38pitches.com, after Game Two of the NBA Finals last year.
I, myself, can say what I want about Kobe being a leader from watching him on TV, but in reality I don’t have the first hand experience for you to believe what I have to say. The reason I find Schilling’s post so informing is that it’s not often you get to read such a controversial post from an objective well respected athlete about a first hand experience he had. Here is the excerpt from Schilling’s blog.
From the first tip until about 4 minutes left in the game I saw and heard this guy bitch at his teammates. Every TO he came to the bench pissed, and a few of them he went to other guys and yelled about something they weren’t doing, or something they did wrong. No dialog about “hey let’s go, let’s get after it” or whatever. He spent the better part of 3.5 quarters pissed off and ranting at the non-execution or lack of, of his team. Then when they made what almost was a historic run in the 4th, during a TO, he got down on the floor and basically said ‘Let’s f’ing go, right now, right here” or something to that affect. . . . But as a fan I was watching the whole thing, Kobe, his teammates and then the after effects of conversations. He’d yell at someone, make a point, or send a message, turn and walk away, and more than once the person on the other end would roll eyes or give a ‘whatever dude’ look.
Now it’s very important to realize again what overrated means. Like I said before, Overrated means that people perceive you to be better than you are. If you talk to the average NBA fan and even some of the so called “experts” as well, many of them will believe things that simply are illogical.
There are those people who believe Kobe is as good or better than Jordan. There is an also even higher percentage of people who believe that Kobe led the Lakers to the title and not Shaq, or that they both had equal roles.
There are also people who believe that career wise, Kobe, a man with no finals MVP, is better career wise than three times finals MVPs Shaq and Tim Duncan, and other all time greats. Kobe hasn’t done anything yet to prove that he belongs in that same company yet.
Therefore, as long as a high percentage of people really believe any of those statements, than Kobe will always be overrated.
From the very beginning of the season, I have said two things:
The Lakers won’t win a championship because Kobe isn’t Michael Jordan, and won’t be able to carry the Lakers unless Andrew Bynum becomes a key part of their offense.
The Cavaliers won’t win a championship because they don’t have that second star to compliment LeBron.
Even as the Cavaliers and Lakers both dominated opponent after opponent on their way to the two best records in the NBA, I still wasn’t satisfied.
As I have said many times, being great in the regular season doesn’t necessarily mean you’re going to be great in the playoffs. Certain teams are built for the playoffs, and I didn’t believe the Lakers and Cavaliers were.
However, before the playoffs, I started wondering whether my predictions weren’t going to come true. The Lakers and the Cavaliers were almost everybody’s favorites to clash in the finals, and I wondered if I was just afraid to take my predictions back.
Throughout the season, most Cavaliers fans have accused me of not actually watching the games, being biased, or not realizing how good Moe Williams was.
I would tell them that I actually liked the Cavaliers, but respected the history of basketball and believed that Moe Williams was not a true superstar. Besides Hakeem in 94, history has shown it is impossible for one man to carry a team on his back to a championship.
LeBron needs that second guy that he just doesn’t have. So far Moe Williams has shown that he is no Scottie Pippen, as he has shot poorly all series long.
Most Lakers fans have failed to see the lack of mental toughness the Lakers have. Besides Kobe’s horrid shooting (.405 FGP) in the finals last year, the main problem for the Lakers was that they couldn’t handle the Celtics physical play.
When Andrew Bynum got hurt, I immediately pronounced that the Lakers weren’t going to win a championship. Bynum brings that big physical presence that the Lakers need in order to win a title.
However, once he came back before the playoffs, I was no longer sure the Lakers weren’t going to win it all.
Obviously, I knew it was going to take Bynum a while to get back to where he was before he got injured. However, even so, I expected him to be a key contributor, especially deeper in the playoffs.
However, the Lakers haven’t let Bynum play enough. And when is playing, he is not getting the ball enough. For a young player like Bynum, it is very important for the Lakers to let him get in rhythm.
However, when he has started off poorly, the Lakers foolishly tend to ignore him the rest of the game. If the Lakers do lose to the Nuggets, it’s because they never tried to get Bynyum going.
As it stands, the Cavaliers are down 1-3 to the Magic, with the series likely over. The Magic just have too many weapons and the Cavaliers frankly don’t have enough.
Although the Lakers are tied with the Nuggets 2-2, the series could very well be over already.
The Nuggets, after leading in both 4th quarters of game one and three, basically gave both games away.
This series isn’t like the Rockets-Lakers series, because there is no underdog. No team is at a disadvantage at any position, like the Rockets were down low.
The winner of this series will just come down to who is playing better. Right now, I don’t see how you can’t say that the Nuggets are playing better than the Lakers.
Right now, my predictions from the beginning of the season look accurate.
Sorry David Stern, but no Kobe or LeBron in this year’s finals.
Come on, Houston, do it for Golden State.
For Bryce Drew.
Hey, for Yao Ming.
No, don’t do it for that team, or that college player everyone has forgotten. Don’t even do it for your center—who can never manage to finish a playoff run.
And definitely don’t do it for Tracy McGrady.
Do it for the NBA. Do it for the fans. Win Game Seven in Los Angeles. Be the underdog that actually came through.
Because really, we need this. I mean, we really need this.
True, the playoffs have been intense. With both of the Boston Celtics’ series grinding it out into a full seven games, and the Denver Nuggets shocking everyone, it has been a remarkable postseason.
But not remarkable enough.
This hasn’t been Muhammad Ali-great. This hasn’t touched the Giants beating the Patriots-awesome.
There have been glimpses of what could end up being the greatest modern postseason, yet, it hasn’t been enough.
We need that, “Did you see that game” conversation. The water cooler is drying up. The superstar, NBA icon, MVP-feud-fed drama is dying down.
All we have left is those pesky reigning champs (Celtics), a trey-launching Orlando squad, and that ensemble of hard-nosed, ghetto Denver Nuggets (and I mean ghetto in the best way possible).
You’re down to your last card, Houston. You’ve put forth a courageous effort. You’ve done the impossible; you’ve shaken Kobe Bryant’s confidence. His swagger, as unbelievable as it may sound, is fading.
It’s time to pull the trigger. Kick the beast while he’s down.
Find your inner-Hakeem Olajuwon, and set him free.
Yao Ming, once again, out for the rest of a season. Check.
Tracy McGrady having nothing to do with the playoffs. Check.
Dikembe Mutombo down, out, and retired. Check.
To the rest of the world, you’re nobodies. You’re living, breathing, walking cliche’s.
Way to hustle, Houston. Way to crash those boards. Great job, Rockets. Atta’ boy, and thanks for getting back on defense. Oh, and let’s not forget boxing your guy out.
That’s all you’ll be hearing when this series is over. That is, unless you put the Lakers to sleep.
Not only could you pull off one of the greatest upsets of our era, but you could change the way people look at the NBA. No. 1 seeds will forever be afraid of you, and anyone else who dares to play team defense.
A no-name squad, led by an interim starting point guard and some Luis Scola guy nobody can stand to look at.
You don’t even have to get to the Finals. You don’t even have to win another game.
Just beat the Lakers. Just shut down Kobe Bryant. Just win, baby.
Do that, and you’ve done your good deed. Do that, and you’ve made history.
Do that, and you’ve made the NBA great, again.
If you didn’t enjoy the Houston Rockets – Los Angeles Lakers game on Sunday, than you’re clearly not a fan of good basketball. The Rockets, a team already without Tracy McGrady that had just lost their best player in Yao Ming for the playoffs, dominated a heavy favorite Lakers’ team in game four.
The Rockets not only showed no fear against the Lakers, they simply embarrassed them.
The Rockets are filled with underdogs and overachievers who showed more heart that I have seen from a team in a long time.
Their center filling in for Yao Ming, Chuck Hayes is only 6’6”, yet he didn’t let Paul Gasol get any easy baskets. The starting point guard Aaron Brooks, although only 6’, was unstoppable in the paint, and scored 34 total points.
Besides Ron Artest and Shane Battier, the Rockets are filled with overachievers who, due to hard work, have become the players they are today. Chuck Hayes is an un-drafted player, who was supposed to be too undersized to play in the NBA.
Aaron Brooks, a 26th overall pick in the 2007 draft, was supposed to be too small to be a point guard in the NBA. Kyle Lowry, another 6’ guard, was the 24th pick in the 2006 NBA Draft.
Forward Carl Landry was the 31st overall pick in 2007. Von Wafer was the 39th overall pick in the 2005 draft. Luis Scola, who played nine years in Europe before coming to the Rockets, was the 55th overall pick in 2002.
In reality, the Rockets will likely still lose this series.
However, regardless if they lose or not, they have shown that they have the key ingredient that the Lakers are missing that is required to win a title: heart.
The Rockets, who have lost McGrady, Yao Ming, and Dikembe Mutumbo for the season, have shown that heart and toughness are the true keys to being a champion. There are some players who frankly a scouting report does not give justice to.
The Rockets are filled with players that get on the court and simply know how to play basketball. There are certain things you can teach and certain things you can’t.
The Lakers, as talented as they are, are just simply missing heart and toughness.
No matter what happens the rest of the series, nobody will ever be able to take away the heart the Rockets showed on Sunday.
Kobe Bryant once again let his frustrations get the best of him. Towards the end of Game Two between the Houston Rockets and L.A. Lakers, Bryant cheap-shotted Ron Artest with an elbow to his throat.
Kobe Bryant has a history of flailing his arms out of frustration.
In 2006, Kobe was suspended two games for elbowing Mike Miller.
In 2007, Kobe was suspended one game for flailing his shooting arm and striking Manu Ginobili.
Less than six weeks later, Kobe was suspended again for flailing his shooting arm, which resulted in Marco Jaric getting whacked in the nose.
By no means do I consider Kobe to be a dirty player. He doesn’t come into games with intentions of flailing elbows. The problem is that he easily gets frustrated and let his emotions control him.
Kobe is so used being able to do whatever he wants on the court, that when he gets challenged by a tough defense like the Rockets, he gets frustrated.
Kobe may have had 40 points last night, but as Charles Barkley noted, it wasn’t an easy 40 points.
Kobe’s frustrations result in him not only faliling elbows, but in general negativity being brought to the team.
Curt Schilling’s post on his official blog, 38pitches.com, after Game Two of the NBA Finals last year, shows a detailed look on how exactly Bryant behaves when he is frustrated.
From the first tip until about 4 minutes left in the game I saw and heard this guy bitch at his teammates. Every TO he came to the bench pissed, and a few of them he went to other guys and yelled about something they weren’t doing, or something they did wrong. No dialog about “hey let’s go, let’s get after it” or whatever. He spent the better part of 3.5 quarters pissed off and ranting at the non-execution or lack of, of his team. Then when they made what almost was a historic run in the 4th, during a TO, he got down on the floor and basically said ‘Let’s f’ing go, right now, right here” or something to that affect. . . . But as a fan I was watching the whole thing, Kobe, his teammates and then the after effects of conversations. He’d yell at someone, make a point, or send a message, turn and walk away, and more than once the person on the other end would roll eyes or give a ‘whatever dude’ look.
As you can see from Schiling’s blog, when a team like the Celtics plays hard-nosed defense similar to the Rockets, Kobe becomes frustrated. A great team leader has to always keep his cool and not let his emotions get the best of him.
The player that he is often compared to, Michael Jordan, never let his frustrations show. Jordan wasn’t just the greatest because he was the most physically talented player, but because mentally he knew how to carry himself on the court.
Kobe’s frustration and inability to keep his composure may have cost him the championship last year. This year it may cost him the title again.
It’s always a wonderful thing when a basketball player heading down the wrong path matures and begins to make the most of his talents.
The Denver Nuggets, for example, have an entire roster filled with such reclamation projects.
Chris Anderson was banned from the NBA for two years for violating the league’s substance abuse policy, but after being reinstated this year, has played with unbridled passion, energy, and enthusiasm.
Nene Hillario was a lost cause after suffering injury after injury and then coming down with testicular cancer.
Finally, given a break from the injury gods, Nene has reclaimed the energy and ferocity that made him such a promising prospect early in his career.
J.R. Smith used to be a selfish punk before tragically losing a friend speeding through a red light two offseasons ago.
Since then, Smith has mellowed out somewhat, has been less of a disaster off the court, and has begun to tap into his unlimited athletic potential.
Even Carmelo Anthony, who after last season’s disastrous playoff loss to the Lakers, claimed that he quit during the series and has turned himself around.
No longer is ‘Melo solely concerned with sabotaging Denver’s offense for his own points, and no longer is he a constant distraction on the court.
Whether by maturing with age; by soaking in the trust, hard work, and leadership of the 2008 Olympic Team, or by believing in the wisdom of Chauncey Billups, this season’s Carmelo Anthony is the most mature Carmelo Anthony the NBA has ever seen.
No small wonder, the Nuggets have played great basketball because of it.
While Carmelo has been able to turn his career around, there are a number of other NBA players in desperate need of reclamation projects to save their NBA careers and reputations.
Allen Iverson—Detroit Pistons
Iverson earned a reputation in the league for being physically fearless—undaunted in challenging the paint against bigger, stronger defenders.
Sadly, in reality, Iverson is a coward who is too scared to reject the bad habits that have plagued his NBA past.
He’s too scared to sublimate his desires to over handle the basketball and make a play only for himself or by driving and dishing.
He’s too scared to focus and play disciplined defense and instead opts to gamble for steals at the expense of leaving his check wide open.
He’s too scared to sacrifice himself (like by accepting a sixth man role) for the good of the team.
And whenever faced with those challenges, he simply removes himself from the situation by blaming his coaches, blaming his teammates, or simply bailing on the team as he did in Detroit this year.
Sadly, Detroit was Iverson’s best chance to convert himself, but he didn’t want to do it.
If he can’t turn those bad habits around, he’ll go down in history as one of the most overrated stat-compilers who ever played the game.
Eddy Curry—New York Knicks
Once upon a time, Curry was a centerpiece to a team’s offense.
Too bad Curry’s always been too much of a nice, aloof guy to have a competitive edge.
And too bad Curry is perpetually lazy and out of shape.
It’s not unreasonable to think that Curry can turn himself around and become a very valuable offensive player somewhere, but—to do that, someone has to convince Curry that he can, and should jump when rebounding or trying to defend.
Andrea Bargnani—Toronto Raptors
The youngster finally began to show glimpses of talent, but it doesn’t excuse the fact that he’s slow, soft, and one of the least aware defensive players in the game.
If someone can sink into his head how to play acceptable defense, he’ll become a useful player.
But right now his defense needs help, ASAP.
Baron Davis—Los Angeles Clippers
It may be best for everyone involved (the Warriors, Clippers, Davis, Mike Dunleavy, Don Nelson, and Monta Ellis) if the Golden State Warriors reclaimed Davis as one of their own.
Rasheed Wallace—Detroit Pistons
A long time ago, Wallace was one of the baddest defensive players around, and an absolute monster in the pivot.
But nowadays, he’s too scared to battle in the pivot, to take big shots, and to play with an edge, instead, becoming an oversized three point shooter.
No small coincidence that as Wallace has wimped out, his Pistons have stopped meeting expectations.
Gerald Green—Dallas Mavericks
The kid oozes talent, but he has no idea how to play organized basketball.
Perhaps he’s simply a late bloomer who’ll flip the switch later rather than sooner, but right now, he’s nothing but a waste of talent.
Amare Stoudemire—Phoenix Suns
Selfish, petulant, immature?
All these words describe Amare Stoudemire who rejects any form of constructive criticism, rejects structured defense, and rejects practicing hard.
His recent comments regarding coaches Mike D’Antoni, Terry Porter, and Alvin Gentry suggest he doesn’t want a coach that will coach him to be the best he can be, but instead wants a coach who will strictly cater to and coddle him.
At this pace, Stoudemire will be an All Time scorer, and an All Time underachiever.
Jerome James—Chicago Bulls
Who knows if James actually has any talent anywhere in his bod; he’s constantly overweight, out of shape, and as a result, injury prone as well.
If he works hard and takes basketball seriously, perhaps…perhaps he can be a respectable end of the bench banger somewhere in the league.
All he is now is a roster formality.
Adam Morrison—Los Angeles Lakers
J.J. Reddick has proven that with confidence, a player can maximize a limited amount of talent and carve a small niche for himself in the NBA.
Too bad Morrison doesn’t even bother working hard on the defensive end, and has no confidence in his point making abilities anymore.
If some team can rehabilitate Morrison’s shattered confidence, perhaps he can be a secondary scorer on some team’s bench. Right now, Morrison is dangerously close to being out of the league.
J.J. Redick sank four out of four free throws in the final minutes, as the Orlando Magic hung on for the win in Boston.
I bet you never thought you’d hear that.
Redick chipped in another solid effort in his second straight start, but the man of the night was Dwight Howard, you dusted off some early rust to lead the Magic to victory.
Howard, who sat out of Orlando’s game six with Philadelphia, was back in action, but only took 12 shots, en-route to a modest 16-point effort. At least, it’s modest for him.
However, that’s where he stopped being timid.
As Howard allowed the rest of his team to do the scoring (9-27 on three’s), he made his presence known on defense, grabbing 22 rebounds, while also rejecting three shots.
In a game where Orlando once had a 28-point lead while displaying their usual “lights out” shooting, the Celtics stuck around to make game one interesting.
After taking an 18-point lead into half-time, the Magic were shut down by the Celtics stingy defense and efficient offense, as Paul Pierce and Rajon Rondo led the Celtics on an impressive 54-41 half-time run.
The story of the second half was less about their offense and defense, though, but more about their time at the charity stripe.
Boston did an excellent job of ball movement, penetrating, and simply executed in the exact moments where error was not an option.
They played nearly flawless basketball for the entire third quarter, and much of the fourth, as they sank 22-26 free throws in the second half, while pulling to within three with just under seven seconds remaining.
Ironically, free throws, their best friend in the second half, were what ended their comeback. Former Duke star J.J. Redick connected on all four of his free throws, and the Celtics were left to heave a three-pointer up with five seconds left, effectively ending the game.
After barely getting through a grueling and hard-fought series with Chicago, it was clear the Celtics were battle-tested, and giving up was never an option.
Oddly enough, it was obvious that Orlando, too, had some fight.
Despite allowing the Celtics to crawl back within one three pointer, they held on, openly admitting that they need to play better against a “a team like Boston”.
Dwight Howard was not hiding his feelings in a post-game interview, as he was clearly upset that his team played so complacently in the final quarter.
This leaves one thing for certain. While the Celtics are sure to be hungry for their first win on their home floor, the Orlando Magic won’t sit back and give it to them.
No, not even if they try.
In his first major action of the 2009 NBA Playoffs, J.J. Redick filled in admirably for Courtney Lee, who missed the sixth game of the series with an injury sustained in game five.
Redick started the game, helping the offense stay hot in the first half, and through the game, by connecting from beyond the arch on all three of his shots in the first half.
He ended the game with 15 points on 5-9 shooting in 31 minutes, showing his coach and teammates that while rookie Courtney Lee will be missed, Redick is still more than capable of producing.
After being in and out of the rotation at an ungodly inconsistent rate for most of the season early on, Redick’s playing time began to increase over the final 30 games.
Becoming more of a role player, Redick has become a player that the Magic can turn to, as they have now lost their second key player on the season.
While it’s nice to promote Redick and note that he had a solid game in a route, it’d be foolish to think everything will be “okay” from here on out.
Lee was a force on defense, as well as a reliable fourth offensive option.
Still, before the game, suspended center Dwight Howard said, “I told JJ he was gonna have a big game this morning” through his updates twitter status.
Redick did just that.
Now, with a rebuilt confidence, and a backing by his entire team, Redick and the Magic will look forward to either Boston or Chicago.
With Boston and Chicago playing on Sunday, Orlando will have nearly a week to prepare for either the reigning NBA champs, or the gritty Bulls.
Considering the series between the two has gone into overtime in four out of five games, the Magic can expect at least another six-game series, as well as a ton of fight from whoever they face.
At least now they know J.J. Redick is along for the ride.
With Kevin Garnett still in street clothes and Ray Allen shockingly exiting the game with his sixth foul, Game Five and the fate of the Boston Celtics championship defense fell to one player.
Luckily for Boston fans, that player was Paul Pierce.
After two seasons of having ample help from his All-Star teammates, Pierce was once again asked to shoulder the load himself late in Game Five, and the reigning NBA Finals MVP came though, valiantly fending off the Bulls after Allen fouled out with 5:27 left in regulation.
With Chicago assassin Ben Gordon fighting through a hamstring injury to hit shot after shot and Joakim Noah cleaning up the middle for the Bulls, things looked bleak for the Celtics, with a 3-2 series deficit staring them in the face as Game Six loomed in the Windy City.
But as he has so many times before, Pierce rose to the occasion.
Struggling with his shot through most of the game, Pierce went to work on the Bulls following Allen’s departure, as Boston attempted to recover from a ten-point deficit in the fourth quarter.
With help from Rajon Rondo and Kendrick Perkins, Boston climbed to within striking distance for Pierce in final seconds of regulation, and the Truth delivered with a clutch spinning jumper to send the game into overtime.
Pierce was even more deadly in overtime, methodically picking his spots and unleashing several money jumpers in the extra frame.
But Chicago still wouldn’t go away.
Pierce hit a series of shots to put the Celtics up three with just over a minute to play, but Gordon was fouled on a three-pointer and responded with three clutch free throws to tie it up.
Pierce would follow with a tough fadeaway jumper over John Salmons with 3.4 seconds left, but it still took a pair of missed free throws by Chicago’s Brad Miller to finally put the Bulls away.
If Boston does indeed take care of business in Game Six, or back home in Game Seven, they clearly know who to thank for preserving their championship defense, as Pierce once again put the Celtics on his back in a clutch situation, out-dueling yet another worthy adversary in Gordon and the Bulls in a critical game.
With this game, Pierce continues to add to his playoff legacy, and cement his status as one of the era’s finest players.
While Kevin Garnett’s maniacal defensive intensity and Ray Allen’s picturesque jump shot get most of the attention, many of the biggest moments in Boston’s recent playoff history have belonged to Pierce.
It was No. 34 who famously manned up against LeBron James in Game Seven of last season’s Conference Semifinal Series against the Cavs, playing the superstar to an epic standstill as the Celts survived at home in the decisive game.
Pierce was also the driving force behind the Celtics monumental Game Four comeback against the Lakers in the Finals, playing Kobe Bryant ferociously as Boston rallied to steal the game, and the series from one of the best two-guards in the history of the game.
His defense on Bryant in the second half of that game set the tone for Boston and enabled them to commence their back-breaking comeback in L.A.
Unless KG can pull a Willis Reed or better, Pierce’s stellar Game Five performance probably isn’t going to lead to another championship banner being raised in Boston.
If they do manage to get past the upstart Bulls, they will likely have the Magic and Cavaliers lying in wait to knock them off of their championship pedestal.
But for one night at least, Paul Pierce once again displayed the heart of a champion, and showed us all how beautiful the game can be when a great player simply refuses to let his team lose.